Thermal treatment, jelly processing and sensory evaluation of cactus pear fruit juice

Autores/as

  • M. De Wit 1Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 399, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa
  • C. Bothma 1Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 399, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa
  • P. Swart 2Department of Consumer Science, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 399, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa
  • M. Frey 1Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 399, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa
  • A. Hugo 1Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 399, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56890/jpacd.v16i.67

Palabras clave:

cactus pear frui, juice, jelly, sensory analysis, free choice profiling

Resumen

Fruit juice plays an important role in human health. In an attempt to increase the use, other than fresh consumption, cactus pear fruit juice was thermally processed (including jelly manufacture) and sensorially analyzed. Fruit from seven cactus pear cultivars used for human consumption, and an animal feed cultivar, was peeled and juice was extracted. Three thermal treatments applied included freezing (-18°C), refrigeration (4°C), and pasteurization (60°C). Ten semi-naïve panelists compared the taste, using their own descriptors and a ten point scale. Twenty four descriptors were generated. The panel was successful in distinguishing between the cultivars used for human consumption and the animal feed cultivar. Pasteurization had a detrimental effect on the flavor of the juice. Descriptive sensory analysis on cactus pear fruit jellies, from seven cactus pear cultivars, compared the following textural attributes: cloudiness, smoothness, pectin content, runniness and cutting edge. Physical analysis of texture was also determined to support the sensory data. There was only a significant difference between the seven cultivars for the sensory descriptor of cloudiness. Both physical tests differed significantly between jellies from the seven cultivars.

##plugins.generic.pfl.publicationFactsTitle##

Metric
##plugins.generic.pfl.thisArticle##
##plugins.generic.pfl.otherArticles##
##plugins.generic.pfl.peerReviewers## 
2.4 promedio

##plugins.generic.pfl.reviewerProfiles##  N/D

##plugins.generic.pfl.authorStatements##

##plugins.generic.pfl.authorStatements##
##plugins.generic.pfl.thisArticle##
##plugins.generic.pfl.otherArticles##
##plugins.generic.pfl.dataAvailability## 
##plugins.generic.pfl.dataAvailability.unsupported##
##plugins.generic.pfl.averagePercentYes##
##plugins.generic.pfl.funders## 
N/D
32% con financiadores
##plugins.generic.pfl.competingInterests## 
N/D
##plugins.generic.pfl.averagePercentYes##
Metric
Para esta revista
##plugins.generic.pfl.otherJournals##
##plugins.generic.pfl.articlesAccepted## 
Artículos aceptados: 19%
33% aceptado
##plugins.generic.pfl.daysToPublication## 
##plugins.generic.pfl.numDaysToPublication##
145

Indexado: {$indexList}

    ##plugins.generic.pfl.indexedList##
##plugins.generic.pfl.editorAndBoard##
##plugins.generic.pfl.profiles##
##plugins.generic.pfl.academicSociety## 
Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development
Editora: 
Professional Association for Cactus Development

Descargas

Publicado

04/24/2014 — Actualizado el 06/20/2020

Número

Sección

Scientific Papers